Additional Information:

I am the owner of a condo unit in Needham. I have a mold problem which stems from water damage coming through the outside bricks. I had a mold assessment company take air and material samples. It was determined that there is extensive mold growth and damage. I assume the management company is responsible for any and all cleaning and repairs to my unit?

ATTORNEY ANSWER:

A condominium is a hybrid type of ownership with individual ownership of the unit and an undivided interest with the other unit owners in the common area of the condominium. The condominium documents and, in particular the Master Deed, will define what is considered common area. Typically, the Trustees of a condominium are responsible for repairs and maintenance in the common area and you are responsible for repairs and maintenance in your unit.    Read the rest of this entry »

Additional  Information:My Boston based business is being sued for a debt from a production company who provided services and was only paid about 20% of the debt. It has been 2 years and we have not had the funds to pay. It was a deal between corporations and it was not in writing and the amount owed is in dispute. We never got our film footage. There was no contract.   Does Mass law require contracts between businesses to be in writing?  Is not having a contract in writing a good defense?  Our company cannot pay it now yet it could within the year and they would have been paid.  Now the time we are wasting for the same end result makes me want to lower this as much as possible.   What can we do?

ATTORNEY ANSWER: Under Massachusetts law, an oral contract is enforceable in court unless the statute of frauds requires such a contract to be in writing. Your contract does not appear to fall within the statute of frauds unless it was “an agreement that is not to be performed within one year from the making thereof”, but I cannot tell from the information you have provide in your question. You state that the amount owed is in dispute, but you do not say why it is in dispute. This dispute should likely be brought as a counterclaim. As you do not have the ability to pay this debt, you certainly do not want to have to pay an attorney a lot of money to defend this matter. My recommendation would be to try to mediate this case and negotiate the debt down as low as possible based upon your dispute and then try to enter into a modest payment plan that you can afford.  Read the rest of this entry »

Additional Information:

Is a non-compete still valid if I only worked during a probationary period?  I started a new job, and worked for 3 weeks before I quit. They promised a lot and delivered very little.  Now they are trying to keep me from earning a living. All I have done for the past 18 years is advertising sales. I just started another job in Needham where the former job was in a different region.  Will Massachusetts courts enforce the non-compete?

ATTORNEY ANSWER:

Your question is difficult to answer without a knowing more facts and the courts will weigh the circumstances of your case based upon a number of criteria. In particular, a noncompetition agreement is enforceable in Massachusetts if the agreement is (1) supported by consideration; (2) necessary to protect a legitimate interest of the employer, and (3) is reasonable as to its duration and geographic scope. Massachusetts law has held that a noncompetition agreement executed prior to or at the commencement of employment is supported by consideration. If you signed the non-compete at the beginning of your work it is probably supported by consideration.  In order for a non-compete to be enforceable it must also protect the employers legitimate business interests.  “Legitimate business interests” to be protected by a non-competition agreement include: (a) trade secrets; (2) confidential information; and (3) good will acquired through dealings with customers. As you quit during your probationary period, you likely did not have access to this information and you can attempt to argue that the non-compete is not enforceable because it does not protect a legitimate business interest. Finally, a covenant not to compete must be “reasonable” in its duration and geographic scope. As you have stated that your former job was in a different region, you could argue that the covenant not to compete is not reasonable in geographic scope as the former job was in a different region. This would be particularly compelling if your former employer does not do business in your new region and has not attempted to do business there. Good luck.  Read the rest of this entry »

Additional Information:

We own a small business outside of Boston.  We have been trying to collect a business debt for $9000 without any luck.  Can I file a claim in small claims court for the money owed to our business or do I need an attorney?  What are the guidelines for filing small claims and what fees are associated if I do this on my own vs. hiring an attorney?

ATTORNEY ANSWER:

In Massachusetts, small claims are brought for matters of $7,000.00 or less, except for an action for property damage caused by a motor vehicle. You have stated that your claim is for $9,000.00 so you would likely have to bring your case in District Court. If, however, your claim is divisible you could attempt to bring two separate cases in small claims court. For example if you had once invoice for $4,000.00 and another for $5,000.00 you could bring to cases and then attempt to have them heard together.  You do not need an attorney to file a small claims case, but you can hire one if you desire. The procedure for bringing a small claims matter would be to go the appropriate District Court where your business operates or where the Defendant resides and you would fill out a form called a “Statement of Claim and Notice of Trial” and pay the filing fee. The filing for small claims varies between $40 and $150.00 depending upon the size of the claim. The court will then set a trial date and you will appear at trial and present your case. A trial is usually informal, but you will want to prepare important documentation to support your claim for $9,000.00 and explain how the transaction arose. An advantage in hiring an attorney is that they are skilled in preparing their case, know what evidence is needed to win a case and can often take aggressive steps, such as attachments, to try to collect any monies awarded. By bringing the claim yourself, you may save attorney fees, but you may not have the experience necessary to win your case and/or to collect what is owed. Good luck.  Read the rest of this entry »

Additional Information:

We own a small family business in Needham and it is doing OK, but not good enough to pay off a credit card judgment against me personally. The bank that handles my business account is worried the credit card company could come after business assets or monies. What can I do to protect the family business?

ATTORNEY ANSWER:

If your business is a sole proprietorship and/or partnership, your credit card company could attempt to attach the assets of your business to pay the debt you owe the credit card company. If your company is a corporation, limited liability partnership (i.e. LLP), and/or limited liability company (i.e. LLC), it is a separate legal entity from you individually and your credit card company cannot go after the business assets. If your business is not currently a corporation, LLC or LLP, you should consider forming one of these entities to protect both your business and personal assets. By setting up a corporation, LLC or LLP, your personal and business assets will be kept separate and you will not be personally liable for debts of the business. You can only loose the amount you have invested in the corporation, LLC or LLP on any debts owed by the business. You should consult with a lawyer and they can describe for you the benefits of establishing a corporation, LLC, and/or LLP.  Read the rest of this entry »

Additional Information:

I own a 1 bedroom condo in Needham and am looking to buy a larger condo. My 1 bed condo is only worth about 25% of what I paid for it.  If I’m unable to rent it after I buy the 2 bedroom, and the 1 bedroom goes into foreclosure, can they take the 2 bedroom from me?  Can I file a declaration of homestead in Massachusetts? Would this help protect my properties?

ATTORNEY ANSWER:

Once again, the answer to your question depends upon the circumstances.  In all likelihood  if your 1 bedroom condominium goes into foreclosure, there will be a deficiency. A deficiency is the difference between what the lender would have received under the promissory note you signed and what the property finally sells for at foreclosure. If your property is only worth about 25% of what you paid for it, your deficiency could be substantial.  Assuming the lender provides the requisite notice to you, the lender would be entitled to sue you for the money that you owe the Lender under the deficiency and could seek to attach and ultimately sell your 2 bedroom condominium to satisfy the deficiency.  If the 2 bedroom is your primary residence, you can file a homestead that will protect you somewhat. With the homestead, the lender that held the deficiency could not foreclose the 2 bedroom to collect the deficiency, but it could still seek to put a lien on the property and when you eventually go to sell or refinance the 2 bedroom condominium you would have to deal with the deficiency at that time. In your situation, you may consider a short sale whereby you negotiate with the lender and seek a release of any deficiency.  The key in any short sale with the lender would be a release of this deficiency debt so that you can move on with your life. Good luck.   Read the rest of this entry »

Additional Information:

My wife and I are considering a short sale on our home in Westwood.  What are the tax obligations we may face?

ATTORNEY ANSWER:

The short answer is that it depends on the circumstances and you should check with a tax accountant on this issue. Generally, with regard to federal sales taxes, your liability depends upon whether the Westwood home is a primary residence or not. If your Westwood home is your primary residence, The Mortgage Debt Relief Act of 2007 generally allows taxpayers to exclude income from the discharge of debt.  The act applies to debt forgiven in the calendar years 2007 through 2012. If your Westwood property is not your principle residence, you will be paying taxes on the short sale deficiency that is forgiven unless you fall into one of the exceptions to this general rule. Once again, we recommend that you speak to a qualified tax professional who is well versed in this area.  Read the rest of this entry »